Time Magazine article rekindles ‘stolen election’ conspiracy theories
The January 6 Capitol riots were the culmination of false allegations that the 2020 election was stolen.
Since then, the Tories, with a few exceptions (looking at you, the My Pillow guy), have reluctantly accepted the reality President Joe Biden has won.
Now a long Time magazine article revives their baseless conspiracy theories.
The article, “The secret story of the shadow campaign that saved the election,” was published Thursday afternoon with little fanfare. Spanning thousands of words, the article describes how a loosely affiliated bipartisan coalition worked together to thwart former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overthrow democracy.
Dozens of sources Time with whom, some for the first time, want Americans to know how close the country is to losing its democracy, in the hope that fewer people will take it for granted.
Their efforts included lobbying Congress for election financing, private philanthropy, voter education, public relations campaigns urging people to vote by mail, pressuring social media companies to crack down on the disinformation, etc.
Another key strategy was to prevent angry liberals from taking to the streets if and when Trump refused to accept the results. They believed that the violence that could result would give him a pretext to send the National Guard, which they feared would end in a coup. This explains the total absence of counter-demonstrators during the riots on the Capitol.
The parties involved in this Time unfortunately, if this is correct, calls for a “conspiracy” to save the election, ranging from groups historically antagonistic to each other, such as the AFL-CIO and the US House of Congress, to the Sierra Club, to the Women’s March, the National Association of Evangelicals, American businesses and many voting rights organizations. A majority involved are Liberals or Democrats, but many are not.
They finally succeeded.
“Democracy has finally won,” the article concludes. âThe will of the people prevailed. But it’s crazy, in retrospect, that this was what it took to organize an election in the United States of America.
The Conservatives have a completely different take-out. For them, the article says that the election was indeed stolen from Trump. They cling to a single line to prove this theory.
The line reads: “This is why participants want the secret story of the 2020 election to be told, even if it sounds like a paranoid fever dream – a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging from all walks of life. industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, direct media coverage and control the flow of information.
There was a conspiracy going on behind the scenes, âthe article adds.
Those who point to it as proof of a stolen election range from members of Congress and right-wing media to conspiracy theorists QAnon and the Proud Boys.
Representative Madison Cawthorn (RN.C.) job the quote on his Telegram channel and Twitter account, adding, âWhat’s in the oligarchy ?!
Twitter users laughed at him; subscribers to his Telegram channel did the opposite. Like the controversial first-year rep, they see the article as evidence of an insidious effort to remove Trump’s election (it doesn’t matter if it was the same election that propelled Cawthorn to power).
Others on the right called it “concerning”, “the tactics of [former Russian dictator Vladimir] Lenin âandâ incriminating â.
They believe the article proves what they and Trump have said all along.
It doesn’t matter whether the article actually describes an effort to protect, rather than subvert, democracy. It gives the Conservatives the ammunition they need to spark fans and supporters.
Regardless of his intentions and the actual direction of the story, Time magazine may have rekindled the stolen election fire.
This week’s top tech stories
* First published: February 5, 2021, 4:25 p.m. CST
Claire Goforth is an award-winning journalist who covers politics and justice from her home base in Jacksonville, Florida. Her work has appeared in publications ranging from regional alt-weeklies to the Guardian.